Comparative Analysis of DOGE and Historical Authoritarian Structures

-

Policy Memorandum

To: Members of Congress
From: [Your Name], Legislative Analyst
Date: [Insert Date]
Subject: Comparative Analysis of DOGE and Historical Authoritarian Structures (Fixing1America Compliance Edition)

Executive Summary
This memorandum identifies and compares structural and behavioral parallels between the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), established by executive fiat, and historical authoritarian agencies such as the Gestapo and SS in Nazi Germany. While not equating intent or outcome, this analysis flags institutional traits that erode democratic norms and consolidate power illegitimately.

I. Background
DOGE was created via Executive Order 14158 (January 20, 2025) without congressional authorization. Led by Elon Musk, it is tasked with "modernizing" the federal bureaucracy using AI, cost-cutting, and deregulation. It has since been involved in sweeping regulatory rewrites and unprecedented access to federal systems, despite having no basis in U.S. law or statute.

II. Comparative Analysis: DOGE vs. Authoritarian Structures

Category DOGE (2025, USA) Gestapo/SS (Nazi Germany)
Legal Creation Created by Executive Order, not by Congress Created by Hitler’s decree, bypassing Reichstag
Legislative Oversight None; bypasses Congress None; reported directly to Führer
Staff Qualifications Includes unvetted college students, AI-driven decisions Ideologically selected; loyalty > expertise
Tools of Control AI policy rewrites, software automation, mass data access Surveillance, detention, propaganda
Transparency No formal hearings, secretive implementation Operated in secrecy
Constitutional Accountability Lacks statutory legitimacy; operates in legal grey zone Operated outside the Weimar constitution
Public Protections Undermined HUD safeguards, Social Security review, deregulation Dissolution of civil protections, legal neutralization
Cultural Personality Cult Elon Musk; tech-savior framing Hitler; national-savior myth

III. Case Example: HUD Regulation Rewrite by AI

  • A third-year college student was placed in charge of an AI-led effort to rewrite HUD regulations.

  • Over 1,000 housing rules were flagged by AI for alteration.

  • The individual had full access to HUD’s data systems, including those affecting vulnerable populations.

  • Regulatory changes occurred without APA public notice or comment.

IV. Legal and Ethical Concerns

  1. Nondelegation Doctrine Violation – Rulemaking is being offloaded to algorithms and unqualified personnel.

  2. Bypassing the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) – No public input, no Federal Register publication.

  3. Due Process Threat – AI alterations may remove rights without legal recourse.

  4. Illegitimate Authority – DOGE was never authorized by Congress; it is operating ultra vires (beyond lawful power).

V. Recommendations

  1. Congressional Hearings

    • Investigate DOGE’s structure, authority, funding, and impact.

  2. Legislative Termination of DOGE

    • Draft and pass a bill explicitly abolishing DOGE and revoking Executive Order 14158.

  3. AI Regulatory Ethics Act

    • Ban the use of unreviewed AI tools in federal rulemaking.

  4. Transparency and Oversight Mandate

    • Require all executive-created agencies to report to Congress quarterly.

VI. Conclusion
DOGE’s current structure and function represent a dangerous overreach of executive power under the guise of efficiency. Without corrective congressional action, it may normalize governance-by-algorithm and erode the legal legitimacy of U.S. rulemaking. The time to restore constitutional balance is now.

Therefore, we the People of the United States demand that this unauthorized and unconstitutional agency — the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) — be immediately disbanded. All actions, rule changes, data access, and terminations enacted under DOGE’s authority shall be nullified. Any federal employees removed or displaced by DOGE shall be reinstated with full benefits and back pay, and all regulatory frameworks unlawfully altered shall revert to their last valid statutory form.

References

  • Executive Order 14158 (2025)

  • Wired, “DOGE Put a College Student in Charge of Using AI to Rewrite Regulations”

  • MarketWatch, “Social Security’s New Commissioner, Rule Reversals, Cost Cuts”

  • The Daily Beast, “DOGE Plan Could Expose Data of Millions”

  • Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 500 et seq.)

  • U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 1

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to remove Judge Aileen Cannon from former President Donald Trump's case

-
 To remove Judge Aileen Cannon from former President Donald Trump's case, several legal procedures could be pursued, but each has specific criteria and steps: 1. Recusal Judge Cannon could voluntarily recuse herself if she believes there's a potential conflict of interest or bias. A motion for recusal can be filed by either the defense or the prosecution, arguing that her impartiality might reasonably be questioned. The decision to recuse lies with the judge herself unless an appellate court intervenes. 2. Motion for Disqualification Either party can file a motion to disqualify Judge Cannon, arguing that she has a conflict of interest, demonstrated bias, or other disqualifying factors. This motion must present substantial evidence supporting the claim. If Judge Cannon denies the motion, the decision can be appealed to a higher court. 3. Appeal to a Higher Court If a motion for recusal or disqualification is denied, the decision can be appealed to an appellate court. The appella...
Read more

Lies have consequences with Trump according to ChapGPT

-
 n someone be arrested such as Trump for spreading lies about FEMa with personnel of FEMA getting death threats? What options does the FBI have in this matter? ChatGPT said: ChatGPT Arresting someone for spreading misinformation about FEMA (or any government agency) that leads to serious consequences, such as death threats against FEMA personnel, involves several complex legal considerations. Here’s a breakdown of relevant laws, FBI options, and potential actions: Legal Options for Arrest and Investigation Federal Laws on Incitement and Threats 18 U.S. Code § 875(c): It is illegal to transmit threats to injure another person through interstate communication (e.g., internet or phone). Incitement to Violence: If the person’s actions are found to encourage imminent lawless action, they could fall under Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969). The key requirement is whether the statements are intended to incite or produce imminent violence and are likely to do so. Obstruction of Government Opera...
Read more

Disinformation is the New American Way

-
Image
I cant tell in the wording that the author doesn't want people to get vaccinated. This is FDA approved now!  When I was a kid, we never thought about not being vaccinated for Mumps, Chicken Pox, smallpox, and Polio. Trump is directly responsible for this right wing insanity, it is killing people in Florida, Alabama, Missippi, and other southern states. Once again the South Dakota Biking rallys has generated thousands of new cases.  It is so bad in the south due to Trump Syndrome that the disinformation as show above is allowing the number of cases to escalate.  No matter how many vaccines you get there will always be a 1-5% of the population that cannot create antibodies for various disesase. This is a revolutionary vaccine that is MrNA based, most vaccines use a dead virus to activate the immune system in the human body. This disease 1st infected Pangalons, Bata, Humans, and Deer, Cats, and Dogs. This rare cross species Covid-21 Lamda variant will affect our society for ...
Read more